Skip to main content.

IVS Portfolio Notebook
1000-025-572


Revision Date: 12.12.16 REV None

  1. The bioactive response of Cortoss has not been assessed in any clinical investigation and the results from laboratory or animal testing may not be predictive of human clinical experience.
  2. Bae, H., et al, A Prospective Randomized FDA-IDE Trial Comparing Cortoss to PMMA for Vertebroplasty: A Comparative Effectiveness Research Study with 24-Months Follow-Up. Spine. 2012; 37(7): 544-550
  3. An Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of an Alternative Material to Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement for Vertebral Augmentation. Stryker Literature Number 5702-0004, Rev. 00
  4. Pomrink, et al., Evaluation of the reaction kinetics of Cortoss, a thermoset cortical bone void ller. Biomaterials, 2003, Vol. 24 (6) 1023-1031.
  5. Cortoss Bone Augmentation Material: Instructions for Use (IFU)
  6. Palussière, Jean et al. "Clinical Results Of An Open Prospective Study Of A Bis-GMA Composite In Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation". European Spine Journal 14.10 (2005): 982-991. Web. 18 Aug. 2016.
  7. Bae, Hyun et al. "Clinical Experience Using Cortoss For Treating Vertebral Compression Fractures With Vertebroplasty And Kyphoplasty". Spine 35.20 (2010): E1030-E1036. Web.
  8. Independent lab results from Fluid Dynamics Inc. commissioned by Stryker July 2009. Testing conducted at 20-21° C (68-70° F).
  9. The Worldwide Orthopaedic Market. Prepared by Knowledge Enterprises. October 2005, p. 11
  10. Orthopaedic Industry Annual Report: 2008-2009. Orthoworld, Inc. 2009, p. 22
  11. Effect of the Stryker Venom™ Cannula and Venom™ Electrode combination on Lesion Size and Anesthesia Delivery During Radiofrequency Ablation 1000-025-195 Rev None